Apr 18, 2007
Quick replies are what we want to avoid. That’s how flamewars start. Ignoring the post is going to be unsatisfactory for the flamewar-prone. That leaves the down-arrow as a sort of relief valve. So I think its presence can actually reduce nastiness.

permalink

* *
Apr 18, 2007
Frameworks don’t solve scalability problems, design solves scalability problems.

..evaluate frameworks based on two rough metrics: how far the framework goes in solving the general case problem out of the box and how little friction the framework creates when you have to solve the specific-case problem yourself.

permalink

* *
Apr 18, 2007
We who read (and write) blogs and play with the latest Internet Trinkets (and build them), a teeny geeky minority whose audience is itself.. this tribe is, over time, growing farther away from the rest of the world. ..the tools we are building and using are accelerating our ability to build and use more of these tools.

permalink

* *
Apr 18, 2007
Mass-produced products vary in quality a lot less than handmade works.

permalink

* *
Apr 18, 2007
In a low-tech society you don’t see much variation in productivity. If you have a tribe of nomads collecting sticks for a fire, how much more productive is the best stick gatherer going to be than the worst? A factor of two? Whereas when you hand people a complex tool like a computer, the variation in what they can do with it is enormous.

permalink

* *
Apr 18, 2007
..while anyone’s reaction to a famous painting will be warped at first by its fame, there are ways to decrease its effects. One is to come back to the painting over and over. After a few days the fame wears off, and you can start to see it as a painting. Another is to stand close. A painting familiar from reproductions looks more familiar from ten feet away; close in you see details that get lost in reproductions, and which you’re therefore seeing for the first time.

permalink

* *
Apr 18, 2007
Consider a skyscraper of exceptional beauty. When you are one kilometer away, you notice its shape, its overall form, and perhaps its relationship to its geography. Come closer, to 500 meters, and the overall form that was beautiful at 1km fades away. But in a seamless progression, it is replaced by the relationship of base to the tower; by the shape of the windows and the color and shadows of the building’s facets. Come in to 100 meters.. The point is that the architect did not consider beauty only at one scale.. The good design morphs as you approach and retreat, surprising and delighting you with new aspects of its beauty.

permalink

* *
Apr 18, 2007
We don’t want to play politics. But encouraging people’s competitive feelings? Oh, yes.

permalink

* *
Apr 18, 2007
We know that one can exaggerate anything to make a point, and yet it is easy to fall into the trap of ending up with an extreme viewpoint because one can’t decide where to draw the line.
me

permalink

* *
Apr 18, 2007
I’ve been resisting the idea, but I have to say that this is starting to feel like another Bubble.

permalink

* *
archive
projects
writings
videos
subscribe
Mastodon
RSS (?)
twtxt (?)
Station (?)