Feb 5, 2008
A founder who gives up more equity to attract cofounders, new hires, and investors builds a more valuable company than one who parts with less equity. However, those superior returns often come from replacing the founder with a professional CEO more experienced with the needs of a growing company. This fundamental tension requires founders to make “rich” versus “king” trade-offs to maximize either their wealth or their control over the company.

Comments gratefully appreciated. Please send them to me by any method of your choice and I'll include them here.

archive
projects
writings
videos
subscribe
Mastodon
RSS (?)
twtxt (?)
Station (?)